MaREA: diseño de una herramienta multidimensional para la autoevaluación de recursos educativos abiertos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.26.034

Palabras clave:

Recursos educativos abiertos, REA, Prácticas educativas abiertas, Educación abierta, Diseño Universal para el Aprendizaje, DUA, Innovación docente, Educación superior, Evaluación, Inclusión, MaREA

Resumen

Los recursos educativos abiertos (REA) se definen no solo por su gratuidad o por el uso de licencias abiertas, sino por una serie de condiciones jurídicas, técnicas, documentales y de accesibilidad que permitan su localización, adaptación, reutilización y preservación efectivas. En este trabajo se presenta MaREA, una herramienta de autoevaluación destinada a evaluar la conformidad formal de recursos individuales con los principios de los REA. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de definiciones, recomendaciones institucionales, marcos de apertura y sistemas de evaluación. A partir de esta síntesis se operacionalizaron seis dimensiones: identificación, acceso y licencia, formato y reutilización, metadatos, accesibilidad, y publicación y preservación. MaREA combina criterios excluyentes, reglas de coherencia y una puntuación ponderada sobre 100, acompañada de un nivel de conformidad y un sello descargable. MaREA integra aspectos que otros instrumentos suelen abordar de forma fragmentaria y facilita una evaluación autónoma e inmediata del recurso evaluado.

Biografía del autor/a

Referencias

Atenas, Javiera; Havemann, Leo (2013). Quality assurance in the open: an evaluation of OER repositories. International Journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning INNOQUAL, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 22-34. http://papers.efquel.org/index.php/innoqual/article/view/30

Atenas, Javiera; Havemann, Leo (2014). Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology, v. 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20889

Atkins, Daniel E.; Brown, John Seely; Hammond, Allen L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf

Ávila, Cecilia; Baldiris, Silvia; Fabregat, Ramon; Graf, Sabine (2016). Cocreation and evaluation of inclusive and accessible open educational resources: a mapping toward the IMS caliper. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologías del Aprendizaje, v. 2, n. 3, pp. 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2016.2589578

Ayuso-del Puerto, Desirée; Gutiérrez-Esteban, Prudencia (2022). Achieving universal digital literacy through universal design for learning in open educational resources. Education as Change, v. 26, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/8712

Ayuso-del-Puerto, Desirée; Gutiérrez-Esteban, Prudencia; Albuquerque-Costa, Fernando (2025). Evaluation of open educational resources: a narrative literature review. International Review of Education, v. 71, n. 1, pp. 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-10099-1

Berners-Lee, Tim (2006). Linked data. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html

Bissell, Ahrash N. (2009). Permission granted: open licensing for educational resources. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, v. 24, n. 1, pp. 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510802627886

Bliss, T. J.; Smith, M. (2017). A brief history of open educational resources. In: Jhangiani, R. S.; Biswas-Diener, R. (eds.) Open: the philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science (pp. 9–27). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.b

Camilleri, Anthony F.; Ehlers, Ulf Daniel; Pawlowski, Jan (2014). State of the art review of quality issues related to open educational resources (OER). European Commission, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. ISBN: 978-92-7937916-1. https://op.europa.eu/publication-detail/-/publication/cfe8487b-8839-4cf1-9b8e-68e3d119b5b9

CAST (Center for Applied Special Technology) (2011). Universal design for learning guidelines. Version 2.0. Lynnfield, MA: CAST. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

Chan, Teresa M.; Thoma, Brent; Krishnan, Keeth; Lin, Michelle; Carpenter, Cristopher R.; Astin, Matt; Kulasegaram, Kulamakan (2016). Derivation of two critical appraisal scores for trainees to evaluate online educational resources: a METRIQ study. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health, v. 17, n. 5, pp. 574-584. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.6.30825

Clements, Kati; Pawlowski, Jan; Manouselis, Nikos (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review: towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 51, pp. 1098-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026

D’Antoni, Susan (2009). Open educational resources: reviewing initiatives and issues. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, v. 24, n. 1, pp. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510802625443

De-la-Rosa-Gómez, Anabel; Meza-Cano, José-Manuel; Miranda-Díaz, Germán-Alejandro (2019). Validation of a rubric to evaluate open educational resources for learning. Behavioral Sciences, v. 9, n. 12, 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9120126

Feldman Maggor, Yael; Rom, Amira; Tuvi Arad, Inbal (2016). Integration of open educational resources in undergraduate chemistry teaching: a mapping tool and lecturers’ considerations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v. 17, pp. 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00184F

Ferguson, Christine L. (2017). Open educational resources and institutional repositories. Serials Review, v. 43, n. 1, pp. 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1274219

Geser, Guntram (2007). Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS Roadmap 2012. http://www.olcos.org/english/roadmap

Green, Cable (2017). Open licensing and open education licensing policy.

https://creativecommons.org/2017/06/05/open-education

Hilton, John L.; Johnson, Aaron; Stein, Jared; Wiley, David (2010). The four R’s of openness and ALMS analysis: frameworks for open educational resources. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680510903482132

Hylén, Jan (2006). Open educational resources: opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of open education. https://www.knowledgeall.com/files/Additional_Readings-Consolidated.pdf

Hylén, Jan; Van Damme, Dirk; Mulder, Fred; D’Antoni, Susan (2012). Open educational resources: analysis of responses to the OECD country questionnaire. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2012/06/open-educational-resources_g17a213c/5k990rjhvtlv-en.pdf

Kawachi, Paul (2013). Open educational resources: TIPS framework. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. ISBN: 978-81-88770-07-6

Kawachi, Paul (2014). Quality assurance guidelines for open educational resources: TIPS framework. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia (CEMCA). http://hdl.handle.net/11599/562

Keats, Derek (2006). Implications of the NonCommercial (NC) restriction for educational content licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) licence. The Southern African Journal of Information and Communication, v. 7, pp. 74-80. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA20777213_60

Marín, Victoria I.; Orellana, Martha-Lucía; Peré, Nancy (2019). Open educational resources for research training: quality assurance through a collaborative evaluation. Research in Learning Technology, v. 27, 2271. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2271

Marín, Victoria I.; Zawacki-Richter, Olaf; Aydin, Cengiz H.; Bedenlier, Svenja; Bond, Melissa; Bozkurt, Aras; Conrad, Dianne; Jung, Insung; Kondakci, Yasar; Prinsloo, Paul; Roberts, Jennifer; Veletsianos, George; Xiao, Junhong; Zhang, Jingjing (2022). Faculty perceptions, awareness and use of open educational resources for teaching and learning in higher education: a cross-comparative analysis. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, v. 17, n. 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00185-z

McNally, Michael B.; Christiansen, Erik G. (2019). Open enough? eight factors to consider when transitioning from closed to open resources and courses: a conceptual framework. First Monday, v. 24, n. 6. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i6.9180

Nesbit, John; Belfer, Karen; Leacock, Tracey (2007). Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI), Version 1.5. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University, E Learning Research and Assessment (eLera) network and the Portal for Online Objects in Learning (POOL).

Network of Open Organizations (2022). OER recommendation actions matrix: possible actions to operationalize the UNESCO OER recommendation. https://web.archive.org/web/20240706101601/https://oep.merlot.org/docs/OER_Recommendation_Actions_Matrix_4-2022.pdf

Nikoi, Samuel K.; Rolet, Tania; Armellini, Alejandro; Witthaus, Gabi (2011). CORRE: a framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources. Open Learning: the Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, v. 26, n. 3, pp. 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.611681

Nonó, Brigit; Azorín-Millaruelo, Cristina; Estupiñá, Eva; Ruiz, María; Santiago-Román, Sonia; Santos-Hermosa, Gema; Vidal, José-Antonio (2025). Pautas para el depósito de Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA) en repositorios institucionales. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11967/1464

Ochoa, Xavier; Duval, Erik (2006). Towards automatic evaluation of learning object metadata quality. In: Roddick, J. F. et al. Advances in Conceptual Modeling - Theory and Practice. ER 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 4231. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11908883_44

OECD (2007). Giving knowledge for free: the emergence of open educational resources. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264032125-en

OLCOS (2012). Open e-Learning Content Observatory Services. Open educational practices and resources: OLCOS roadmap 2012. https://www.olcos.org/cms/upload/docs/olcos_roadmap.pdf

Ovadia, Steven (2019). Addressing the technical challenges of open educational resources. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, v. 19, n. 1, pp. 79-93. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/lg_pubs/120

Poce, Antonella; Amenduni, Francesca; Re, Maria-Rosaria; De-Medio, Carlo (2019). Establishing a MOOC quality assurance framework: a case study. Open Praxis, v. 11, n. 4, pp. 451-460. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1019

Reale, Jean; O’Brien, Emma; Ceallaigh, T. J. Ó.; Connolly, Cornelia (2022). A third space: infusing open educational resources (OER) with universal design for learning (UDL). In: Linda Daniela (ed.). Educational communications and technology: issues and innovations (pp. 13–25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14775-3_2

Rice, Mary-Frances; Ortiz, Kelsey R. (2021). Evaluating digital instructional materials for K–12 online and blended learning. TechTrends, v. 65, n. 6, pp. 977-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00671-z

Risquez, Angelica; McAvinia, Claire; Desmond, Yvonne; Bruen, Caroline; Ryan, Diarmuid; Coughlan, Ann (2020). Towards a devolved model of management of OER? The case of the Irish higher education sector. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 100-112. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4545

Sanabria-Z, Jorge; Alfaro-Ponce, Berenice; González-Pérez, Laura Icela; Ramirez Montoya, María Soledad (2024). Reusable educational resources for developing complex thinking on open platforms. Education and Information Technologies, v. 29, pp. 1173-1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12316-0

Santos-Hermosa, Gema; Abadal, Ernest (2022). Recursos educativos abiertos: una pieza fundamental para afrontar los actuales retos de la Educación Superior. Octaedro. ISBN: 978-84-19023-70-4

Santos-Hermosa, Gema; Estupinyà, Eva; Nonó-Rius, Brigit; París-Folch, Lidón; Prats-Prat, Jordi (2020). Open educational resources (OER) in the Spanish universities. Profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 6, e290637. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.37 http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/70243

Santos-Hermosa, Gema; Ferran-Ferrer, Núria; Abadal, Ernest (2017). Repositories of open educational resources: an assessment of reuse and educational aspects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, IRRODL, v. 18, n. 5, pp. 84-120. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3063

Sousa, Lorena; Pedro, Luís; Santos, Carlos (2023). A systematic review of systematic reviews on open educational resources: an analysis of the legal and technical openness. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, v. 24, n. 3, pp. 18-33. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.7196

Tavakoli, Mohammadreza; Elias, Mirette; Kismihók, Gábor; Auer, Sören (2021). Metadata analysis of open educational resources. In: LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 626-631). https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448208

UNE (2020). UNE 71362:2020. Calidad de los materiales educativos digitales. Madrid: Asociación Española de Normalización.

UNESCO (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128515_eng

UNESCO (2012). Declaración de París de 2012 sobre los REA. En World Open Educational Resources Congress. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246687_spa

UNESCO (2019). Recommendation on open educational resources (OER). https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-educational-resources-oer

UNESCO (2024). Guidelines on the implementation of the OER recommendation action area 3: effective, inclusive and equitable access to quality OER. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389037

UNESCO (2025). Declaración de Dubái sobre los recursos educativos abiertos (REA): bienes públicos digitales y tecnologías emergentes al servicio de un acceso equitativo e inclusivo al conocimiento. En 3rd World Open Educational Resources Congress. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000392271_spa.locale=en

W3C (2024). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22

Wiley, David (2014). The access compromise and the 5th R. Improving Learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/the-access-compromise-and-the-5th-r

Wiley, David (2023). Defining the ‘Open’ in Open Content and Open Educational Resources. http://opencontent.org/definition

Wojcik, Joanna; Rataj, Malgorzata (2020). Learning objects lost in the network. En: 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 7 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274278

Yuan, Min; Recker, Mimi (2019). Does audience matter? comparing teachers’ and non teachers’ application and perception of quality rubrics for evaluating open educational resources. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 67, n. 1, pp. 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9605-y

Zhang, Xiangling; Tlili, Ahmed; Nascimbeni, Fabio; Burgos, Daniel; Huang, Ronghuai; Chang, Ting-Wen; Jemmi, Mohamed; Khribi, Mohamed Koutheair (2020). Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: a systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, v. 7, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0113-2

Descargas

Publicado

2026-10-27

Cómo citar

Alcaraz-Martínez, R., & Santos-Hermosa, G. (2026). MaREA: diseño de una herramienta multidimensional para la autoevaluación de recursos educativos abiertos. Infonomy, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.26.034

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Dimensions

Societal impact