EdTech and inclusion: Educational technology at the service of functional diversity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.26.009

Keywords:

EdTech, Educational inclusion, Digital accessibility, Visual impairment, Hearing impairment, Motor disability, Assistive technology, WCAG, Universal Design for Learning

Abstract

This article analyzes sixteen educational technology (EdTech) platforms, focusing on their potential to enhance the learning experience for individuals with visual, hearing, or motor disabilities. Using an analytical framework that integrates the perspective of inclusive education and international digital accessibility standards (WCAG 2.1, ATAG 2.0), it examines how each tool meets or falls short of the specific needs of these groups. Additionally, it describes the primary use, general advantages, and limitations of each platform, categorized into five areas: massive open online courses (MOOCs), language teaching, early childhood education, professional development, and classroom tools. The article concludes with a comparative analysis of the inclusive maturity of the sector and recommendations for educators, institutions, and developers.

Author Biography

Nicoleta-Roxana Dinu, Biblioteca Națională a României

References

ADA (2020). La Ley sobre Estadounidenses con Discapacidades, adicción y recuperación para gobiernos estatales y locales. https://adata.org/factsheet/add-rec-gov-esp

Bates, A. W. (Tony) (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. ISBN: 978 0 995269255

CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Deci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M. (2000). The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

European Commission (2016). Directive 2016/2102 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/2102/oj/eng

Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu-Rekha; Adams, Andrew-Alexandar; Williams, Shirley-Ann (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

Naciones Unidas, Organización Mundial de la Salud (2023). Informe mundial sobre discapacidad 2023. OMS/OPS. https://www.un.org/es/disabilitystrategy/sgreport/2023

Unesco (2023). Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Global Education Monitoring Report. Unesco Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology

W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21

WebAIM (2023). Screen Reader User Survey #10 Results. https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey10

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Dinu, N.-R. (2026). EdTech and inclusion: Educational technology at the service of functional diversity. Infonomy, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.26.009

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Dimensions