Health information. The role of the journalist
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.24.005Keywords:
Information, Health, Journalism, Fake news, Scientific journalism, Science, Public health, Public opinion, Media and social networksAbstract
Journalism always requires ethics and responsibility from those who practice it, and science journalism is no exception. However, health journalism is a particularly delicate field within the profession: alarmist, sensationalist, or less rigorous communication from other areas of science can lead the reader to misunderstand the Higgs boson or, at most, believe that a meteorite could impact Earth. In the case of health, there is a danger of creating confusion, alarm, false hopes, and over-expectations on such delicate and personal matters as cancer and Alzheimer's, or matters of public health importance such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, one of the most important and challenging tasks of the science journalist in urgent contexts is, paradoxically, not to publish. In other words, deciding which information, preprints, studies, reports, press releases, and even debates deserve to reach the public opinion and which ones do not.References
Cacciatore, M. A. et al. (2012) «Coverage of emerging technologies: A comparison between print and online media». New media & society, v. 14, n. 6, pp. 1039-1059. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444812439061
Catalán-Matamoros, D.; Peñafiel-Saiz, C. (2019). «Specialty matters. Analysis of health journalists’ coverage about vaccines». El profesional de la información, v. 28, n. 2. https://doi.org//10.3145/epi.2019.mar.01
Elías-Pérez, C.; Catalán-Matamoros, D. (2020). «Coronavirus: Fear to “official” fake news boosts WhatsApp and alternative sources». Media communication, v. 8, pp. 462-466. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/30665
Hinnant, A.; Len-Ríos M. E.; Hyun-Jee, O. (2012). «Are health journalists’ practices tied to their perceptions of audience? An attribution and expectancy-value approach». Health communication, v. 27, n. 3, pp. 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.578331
Lewis, J.; Cushion, S. (2017). «Think tanks, television news and impartiality: The ideological balance of sources in BBC programming». Journalism studies, v. 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1389295
López-Doblas, M.; Luque-Martín, N.; Martín-Barato, A. (2020). Medios de comunicación y COVID-19. Pautas para una información responsable. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. http://www.easp.es/web/coronavirusysaludpublica/medios-de-comunicacion-y-covid-19-pautas-para-una-informacion-responsable
Mejia, Christian, et al. (2020). «The media and their informative role in the face of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Validation of fear perception and magnitude of the issue (MED-COVID-19 )». Electronic journal of general medicine, v. 17, n. 6. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/7946
Nguyen, A.; Catalán-Matamoros, D. (2020). «Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19». Media communication, v. 8, pp. 323-328. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352
Stroobant, J.; De Dobbelaer R.; Raeymaeckers, K. (2018). «Tracing the Sources: A comparative content analysis of Belgian health news», Journalism practice, v. 12, n. 3, pp. 344-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1294027
The New York Times (2020). Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be. August 29. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Viswanath K. et al. (2008). «Occupational practices and the making of health news: A national survey of U.S. health and medical science journalists». Journal of health communication, v. 13, n. 8, pp. 759-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730802487430
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sergio Ferrer-Pérez, Carmen Peñafiel-Saiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
