Analysis of the research about the Fediverse: Mastodon, Lemmy, Pleroma and other fediverse platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.24.017Keywords:
Fediverse, Mastodon, Lemmy, Pleroma, Social networks, Federation, Decentralization, Instances, Free software, Scientific community, Open science, Scientific evidenceAbstract
This article presents the results of an analysis of the research about the Fediverse, Mastodon, Lemmy, Pleroma, and other fediverse platforms, considering 60 documents retrieved. Publications increase in 2022 and 2023, coinciding with Elon Musk's arrival on Twitter and the so-called waves of migration to Mastodon. The main type of document is the conference article, followed by scientific journal articles and preprints. Much of the publications are open access or free and English is the main language. On the other hand, the main topic is the nature of the Fediverse and its values of federation, decentralization, openness, and its horizontal structure based on instances. Other important topics are the analysis of contents and consumption, and activism. Finally, the article focuses on the relationship between the scientific community and the Fediverse, commenting on some cases of unethical treatment and collection of data from the people in the Fediverse, and highlighting and thinking about the relationship between the values of the federated universe and those of open science.
References
ActivityPub (2018). ActivityPub - W3C Recommendation 23 January 2018. https://w3.org/TR/activitypub
Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2022). Statement of Removal - Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13(01). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/22003
Bittermann, André; Lauer, Tim; Peters, Fritz (2023). “Academic #TwitterMigration to Mastodon: The role of influencers and the Open Science movement”. PsychArchives. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.13062
Braun, Joshua (2023). “Journalism, media research, and Mastodon: Notes on the future”. Digital journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2208619
Brembs, Björn; Lenardic, Adrian; Chan, Leslie (2023). “Mastodon: a move to publicly owned scholarly knowledge”. Nature, 614, 624. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00486-3
Brembs, Björn; Lenardic, Adrian; Murray-Rust, Peter; Chan, Leslie; Irawan, Dasapta-Erwin (2023). “Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge”. Royal Society Open Science, v. 10, n. 7 (10230207). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230207
fediverse.info (2024). Projects. A community list of fediverse projects. https://fediverse.info/explore/projects
fediverse.party (2024). Fediverse. Party - explore federated networks. https://fediverse.party/en/miscellaneous
Gehl, Robert W. (2022). Foss Academic | More Mastodon scraping without consent (Notes on Nobre et al 2022). FOSS Academic. https://fossacademic.tech/2022/10/18/notesOnNobreEtAl.html
jointheFediverse.wiki (2024). What is the Fediverse? - Join the Fediverse. https://joinfediverse.wiki/What_is_the_Fediverse%3F
Nobre, Gabriel P.; Ferreira, Carlos H. G.; Almeida, Jussara M. (2022). “More of the same? A study of images shared on Mastodon’s federated timeline”. In: Hopfgartner, F.; Jaidka, K.; Mayr, P.; Jose, J.; Breitsohl, J. (eds.). Social informatics. SocInfo 2022. Lecture notes in computer science, v. 13618. Cham: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_11
Schoch, David; Chan, Chung-hong (2023). “Software presentation: Rtoot: Collecting and analyzing Mastodon data”. Mobile media & communication, 11(3), 575-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579231176678
Siebert, Maximilian; Siena, Leonardo-Maria; Ioannidis, John P. A. (2023). “Twitter and Mastodon presence of highly-cited scientists”. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.23.537950
Stokel-Walker, Chris (2022). “Should I join Mastodon? A scientists’ guide to Twitter’s rival”. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03668-7
Zignani, Matteo; Quadri, Christian; Galdeman, Alessia; Gaito, Sabrina; Rossi, Gian-Paolo (2019). “Mastodon content warnings: Inappropriate contents in a microblogging platform”. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, v. 13. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3262
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Downloads
Dimensions
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pedro Lázaro-Rodríguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
