Artificial intelligence in the editorial processes of academic journals: Practical proposals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.23.009Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Academic journals, Editorial management, Generative artificial intelligence, GAI, Editorial processes, Scientific journalsAbstract
An exploration of how generative artificial intelligence (GAI) can assist in key tasks of the editorial process is presented. This includes operations such as peer review, identification of relevant content, detection of content generated by GAI (equated to plagiarism), and ultimately, the optimization of workflows. The described examples are practical instances that, for the time being, should be understood conceptually, as their practicality at any scale is not considered, depending on future developments in applications and their interconnectivity.
References
Codina, Lluís (2023). “Buscadores alternativos a Google con IA generativa: análisis de You.com, Perplexity AI y Bing Chat [Alternative search engines to Googlewith generative AI: analysis of You.com, Perplexity AI and Bing Chat]”. Infonomy, v. 1, e23002. https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.23.002
Franganillo, Jorge (2023). “Los grandes modelos de lenguaje: una oportunidad para la profesión bibliotecaria”. Anuario ThinkEPI, v. 17, e17a28. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a28
Lopezosa, Carlos; Codina, Lluís; Ferran-Ferrer, Núria (2023) ChatGPT como apoyo a las systematic scoping reviews: integrando la inteligencia artificial con el framework SALSA. Col•lecció del CRICC. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
