The challenge of analyzing influencer communities in the algorithmic age: a methodological framework for audiovisual social media platforms with algorithmic recommendation feeds

Authors

  • Laura Medel Vivas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.26.037

Keywords:

Social media networks, Influencer marketing, Digital communities, Online interaction, Graph theory, Algorithmic platforms, Recommendation systems, Public comments, Research methodology, Social network analysis, Algorithmic feed, TikTok

Abstract

The evolution of social media platforms toward algorithmic recommendation systems calls for a rethinking of how communities built around influencers are identified and analyzed. Public metrics, such as follower counts and engagement rates, do not provide a clear picture of participation structures: following an account affects content exposure but does not determine it, and interaction does not require users to already follow the account. This study therefore proposes a methodological model based on publicly visible actions to identify and compare communities of observable interaction through public comments. The model combines social network analysis (SNA) with comment analysis. It maps relationships between influencers and participants, distinguishes communication directed at creators from exchanges among users, identifies recurring participation, and estimates the overlap of commenters across accounts. The protocol is applied on an exploratory basis to TikTok posts by ten Spanish food influencers. The findings reveal that participation is predominantly occasional and centralized, alongside a smaller share of conversations among individual users. The communities identified are organized primarily around each influencer’s ecosystem rather than as dense, topic-based subgroups. The model enables communication professionals to compare participation structures and assess whether different accounts or strategies generate one-off responses or sustained relationships. It is operationalized as a replicable protocol that can be adapted to other audiovisual social media platforms or platforms with algorithmically curated feeds, while incorporating ethical and regulatory criteria for data collection and processing.

Author Biography

References

Ballesteros-Herencia, Carlos A. (2019). La representación digital del engagement: hacia una percepción del compromiso a través de acciones simbólicas. Revista de Comunicación, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 215-233. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC18.1-2019-A11

Bhandari, Anil; Bimo, Sara (2022). Why’s everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media. Social Media + Society, v. 8, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241

Blondel, Vincent D.; Guillaume, Jean-Loup; Lambiotte, Renaud; Lefebvre, Etienne (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, v. 2008, n. 10, P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

Boyd, Danah (2026). Social media is now parasocial media. Social Media + Society, v. 12, n. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051261437487

Breves, Priska; Liebers, Nicole (2025). The impact of following duration on the perception of influencers and their persuasive effectiveness explained by parasocial relationship stages. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, v. 46, n. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2024.2320186

Bucher, Taina (2018). If… then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001

Campbell, Colin; Farrell, Justine Rapp (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, v. 63, n. 4, pp. 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003

Duan, Yiran; Khoury, Christy; Joh, Una; Smith, Alex O.; Cousin, Calvin; Hemsley, Jeff (2024). Comparing climate change content and comments across Instagram reels, TikTok, and YouTube shorts and long videos. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 1, pp. 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1012

Farivar, Samira; Wang, Fang; Yuan, Yufei (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, v. 59, 102371.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371

Fiesler, Casey; Beard, Nathan; Keegan, Brian C. (2020). No robots, spiders, or scrapers: Legal and ethical regulation of data collection methods in social media terms of service. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, v. 14, n. 1, pp. 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7290

Fortunato, Santo; Barthélemy, Marc (2007). Resolution limit in community detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 104, n. 1, pp. 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605965104

Fox, Jesse; Pearce, Katy E.; Massanari, Adrienne L.; Riles, Julius Matthew; Szulc, Łukasz; Ranjit, Yerina S.; Trevisan, Filippo; Soriano, Cheryll Ruth R.; Vitak, Jessica; Arora, Payal; Ahn, Sun Joo (Grace); Alper, Meryl; Gambino, Andrew; Gonzalez, Carmen; Lynch, Teresa; Williamson, Lillie D; Gonzales, Amy L. (2021). Open science, closed doors? Countering marginalization through an agenda for ethical, inclusive research in communication. Journal of Communication, v. 71, n. 5, pp. 764-791. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab029

Franzke, Aline Shakti; Bechmann, Anja; Zimmer, Michael; Ess, Charles M.; Association of Internet Researchers (2020). Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf

Freelon, Deen; Monzer, Cristina; Jeon, Gayoung; Moy, Cameron; Williams, Natasha (2024). The post-API age of social media data access: Past, present, and future. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 715, n. 1, pp. 16-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251372557

Gerbaudo, Paolo (2026). TikTok and the algorithmic transformation of social media publics: From social networks to social interest clusters. New Media & Society, v. 28, n. 3, pp. 1019-1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241304106

Gräve, Jan-Frederik (2019). What KPIs are key? Evaluating performance metrics for social media influencers. Social Media + Society, v. 5, n. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119865475

Guarino, Stefano; Mounim, Ayoub; Caldarelli, Guido; Saracco, Fabio (2026). Leveraging content producer networks and user perception to detect online discursive communities. Scientific Reports, v. 16, 11911. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39477-5

Hoffner, Cynthia A.; Bond, Bradley J. (2022). Parasocial relationships, social media, & well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, v. 45, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101306

Horton, Donald; Wohl, Richard R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, v. 19, n. 3, pp. 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049

Mosseri, Adam (2023). Instagram ranking explained. Instagram, 31 May. https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/instagram-ranking-explained

Murthy, Dhiraj; Sharma, Sanjay (2019). Visualizing YouTube’s comment space: online hostility as a networked phenomena. New Media & Society, v. 21, n. 1, pp. 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818792393

Ouvrein, Gaëlle (2025). Followers, fans, friends, or haters? A typology of the online interactions and relationships between social media influencers and their audiences based on a social capital framework. New Media & Society, v. 27, n. 10, pp. 5659-5690. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241253770

Parlamento Europeo (2016). Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 27 de abril de 2016, relativo a la protección de las personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la libre circulación de estos datos (Reglamento General de Protección de Datos). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, L 119, 88 pp. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679

Pelttari, Sanna (2025). Commenting behavior as a mirror of parasocial relationships and emotional attachment on YouTube: A qualitative study of comments on product-promoting videos in Spanish. Pragmatics and Society, v. 16, n. 6, pp. 828-849. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.24075.pel

Primetag; IAB Spain (2024). Influencer economy: los datos del mercado sin filtros. IAB Spain. https://iabspain.es/estudio/influencer-economy-los-datos-del-mercado-sin-filtro

Rogers, Richard (2018). Otherwise engaged: Social media from vanity metrics to critical analytics. International Journal of Communication, v. 12, pp. 450-472. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6407

Ronzhyn, Alexander; Cardenal, Ana-Sofia; Batlle-Rubio, Albert (2023). Defining affordances in social media research: A literature review. New Media & Society, v. 25, n. 11, pp. 3165-3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187

Swani, Kunal; Labrecque, Lauren I. (2020). Like, comment, or share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices. Marketing Letters, v. 31, n. 2-3, pp. 279-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09518-8

TikTok (2020). How TikTok recommends videos #ForYou. TikTok Newsroom, 11 March. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/how-tiktok-recommends-videos-for-you

Traag, Vincent A.; Waltman, Ludo; Van Eck, Nees Jan (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports, v. 9, 5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z

Trezza, Domenico (2023). To scrape or not to scrape, this is dilemma. The post-API scenario and implications on digital research. Frontiers in Sociology, v. 8, 1145038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1145038

Van-Atteveldt, Wouter; Peng, Tai-Quan (2018). When communication meets computation: Opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in computational communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, v. 12, n. 2-3, pp. 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084

Vassey, Julia; Chang, Ho-Chun Herbert; Valente, Tom; Unger, Jennifer B. (2025). Worldwide connections of influencers who promote e-cigarettes on Instagram and TikTok: A social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 165, 108545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108545

Vrontis, Demetris; Makrides, Anna; Christofi, Michael; Thrassou, Alkis (2021). Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, v. 45, n. 4, pp. 617-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12647

Wies, Simone; Bleier, Alexander; Edeling, Alexander (2023). Finding goldilocks influencers: How follower count drives social media engagement. Journal of Marketing, v. 87, n. 3, pp. 383-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221125131

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21

How to Cite

Medel Vivas, L. (2026). The challenge of analyzing influencer communities in the algorithmic age: a methodological framework for audiovisual social media platforms with algorithmic recommendation feeds. Infonomy, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/infonomy.26.037

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Dimensions

Societal impact